Still lingering on the edge of truth . . .

One more time so we never forget - something to ponder in our old age -

Saturday, November 24, 2012

49 years and counting ...

It seems that even after this long long time it would be appropo to repost a couple of things about that infamous day in history. There are still a few reads you can research yourself. But even if you do, they still lead to nothing but even more questions about what actually happened that day in Dallas ..... 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
from November 24, 2010

Today in History - November 24

Lee Harvey Oswald.
While the world was still reeling at the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, we saw the alleged perpetrator of the crime, caught and killed only two days later, and on national TV!
And these many years on we can only marvel at the speed with which his apprehension for the crimes happened. And the positive assertion that Oswald was undoubtedly the lone killer of Officer Tippit and President John F. Kennedy.
All these instant conclusions would be astounding even in todays era of nanosecond web communication. Yet over these years so many nagging doubts still evoke questions.

Oswald was supposed to have shot Kennedy from a 6th floor coign of vantage in the Texas Schoolbook Depository, with a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle. But first it was identified as a 7.65 Italian Mauser, by sherrifs and FBI Special Agents. Affidavits were signed. Then it became a 6.5 Carcano rifle. Why? Because the FBI discovered that Oswald HAD purchased a Carcano, but NOT a Mauser. And even other rifles are now mentioned. And it took a world class marksman from the Army to nearly duplicate the 3 shots in 4.5 seconds feat! Other trained US Marine snipers said it could not be done.
And an almost perfect bullet 'appeared' on the stretcher bearing the President's body. A bullet that went through TWO bodies. Which looks as if the Lone Ranger put it there!

Oswald was even identified by someone who SAW him up there from across the street! Is that believeable today?

Oswald was supposedly seen being questioned by Tippit shortly after leaving his job and taking to the streets. Witnesses said they saw him shoot Tippit. They even saw him REloading his handgun while fleeing! Does that sound like a frightened killer or a prearranged murder? Yet other witnesses said another car pulled up, a man got out and shot Tippit and then roared away! Someone else saw two men who were NOT Oswald. Witnesses even identified a different assailant as heavy set, wearing a long overcoat. Many witnesses claimed intimidations and threats about their testimonys. Several eye-witnesses died soon after. Here is a list of the first months - 

Date	Name	Connection with case	Cause of death
11/63	Karyn Kupicinet	Tv host's daughter who was overheard telling of JFK's death prior to 11/22/63	Murdered
12/63	Jack Zangretti	Expressed foreknowledge of Ruby shooting Oswald	Gunshot Victim
2/64	Eddy Benavides	Lookalike brother to Tippit shooting witness, Domingo Benavides	Gunshot to head
2/64	Betty MacDonald	Former Ruby employee who alibied Warren Reynolds shooting suspect.	Suicide by hanging in Dallas Jail
3/64	Bill Chesher	Thought to have information linking Oswald and Ruby	Heart attack
3/64	Hank Killam	Husband of Ruby employee, knew Oswald acquaintance	Throat cut
4/64	Bill Hunter	Reporter who was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63	Accidental shooting by policeman
5/64	Gary Underhill	CIA agent who claimed Agency was involved	Gunshot in head ruled suicide
5/64	Hugh Ward	Private investigator working with Guy Banister and David Ferrie	Plane crash in Mexico
5/64	DeLesseps Morrison	New Orleans Mayor	Passenger in Ward's plane
8/64	Teresa Norton	Ruby employee	Fatally shot
6/64	Guy Banister	x-FBI agent in New Orleans connected to Ferrie, CIA, Carlos Marcello & Oswald	Heart attack
9/64	Jim Koethe	Reporter who was in Ruby's apartment on 11/24/63	Blow to neck
9/64	C.D. Jackson	"Life" magazine senior Vicepresident who bought Zapruderfilm and locked it away	Unknown
10/64	Mary Pinchot	JFK "special" friend whose diary was taken by CIA chief James Angleton after her death	Murdered

The Warren Commission ignored most of it.

And what was Officer Tippit up to on the hour before he died? Why was he far out of his patrol area? Why did he suddenly rush to 10th Street and stop to make a phone call in a cafe but only listened and said nothing? Why did he seem panicked when he made the call? He left his car radio at a crucial time. Then he was seen cruising very slowly on another street. Why was Tippit known in the area he died in? Some witnesses thought he lived nearby. But it was miles from his patrol area and his home?

How did anyone know Oswald's path of exit? Was it coincidence? Happenstance? Or enemy action? Officer Tippit was directed exactly where to go, minutes after the murder. Then radioed back when he was in position. Why was Tippit directed to 10th St? Was he? The Dallas police lieutenant who may have directed Tippit that day, Harry Dean Thomas, married his widow three years later.
The shells from the Tippit shooting were gathered by policeman, J.M. Poe, and he marked them with his initials, however, the shell casings eventually entered into evidence had no such markings.

Oswald went to his rooming house first. Who were the two policemen who stopped in front, gave two horn honks and went away? Then he went to a movie theatre. Why did he go there instead of staying on a bus and getting far away? Was he under a prearranged instruction to go to that theatre? Part of a plan to have him where someone wanted him? Did someone give him a revolver there? Perhaps the very revolver just used to kill a Dallas Police Officer? Perhaps by the very person who DID kill Tippit? The revolver in his possession was fully loaded with no empty chambers. And he had no additional ammunition with him. So if Oswald shot Tippit four times, and REloaded, then he must have had only had four extra bullets with him? Seems too odd, doesn't it? And four cartridge cases were found lying on the ground near the scene of the murder. [the gun Oswald was in possession of was a revolver, revolvers don't eject casings)  Instead of immediately fleeing the scene of the crime, did the killer discard four vital pieces of evidence that could have been used against him? Or were they deliberately placed at the scene? The four cartridge cases were traced to Oswald's revolver, although they were never matched to the bullets.

Oswald was constant in his claim that he was a patsy. He was innocent. He never shot anybody. And more than one scholar who has gone through the whole case has said the Mexico and Soviet Union implications could have easily pointed to Oswald being a CIA spy. Or was that all part of the illusion?
Alas, all these years later we are still suspicious, yet nowhere near advanced in our factuals about how it happened. The circumstances seem just too complex. The evidence now too scattered. Diffused. Lost. Misinformation and disinformation. Indeed, but we have more questions than ever.
His actions seem to be a response to suddenly realizing he had been set up. Confusion, desperation, the compounding of events leading him to take a predetermined escape route as his only hope. A route designed by who?

Lee Harvey Oswald was never actually charged with killing the President.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

and from September 27, 2011

This day in history - - - September 27

(1963 – 64) The Warren Commission. A group appointed by Pres. Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate the circumstances surrounding President John F. Kennedy's slaying and the shooting of his (alleged) assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald. It was chaired by Earl Warren and included two U.S. senators, two U.S. congressmen, and two former public officials.
After months of investigation, it reported that Kennedy was killed by Oswald's rifle shots from the Texas School Book Depository and that Oswald's murder by Jack Ruby two days later was not part of a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy.
Its findings were later questioned in a number of books and articles and in a special congressional committee report in 1979, though no conclusive contradictory evidence was found.

JD Tippit

One of those first books, Rush to Judgment, by lawyer Mark Lane, pointed out that the conclusions in the Summery, those few pages that most people and reporters read, had little to do with the volumes of actual evidence in the content. When you read the content, after having digested to summary, there was no relationship to the facts. And the summery becomes nothing more than a blatant lie! Obviously distilled and twisted by the members listed below for the very purpose of further obfuscating the event.
Today a believer of this, 'Oswald alone', conclusion is rare. And because that summery seemed falsified, it berthed a lifetime of conspiracy theories about the President's death.
Even following the interesting side story of the trail of Officer Tippit on that day and you might join the legions of disbelievers.

The members of that Warren Commission were -

- Earl Warren - Chief Justice of the United States. Eisenhower offered Warren the post of solicitor general, with the promise of a seat on the Supreme Court. But before it was announced, Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson unexpectedly died in September 1953 and Eisenhower replaced him with Warren. As Chief Justice of the United States some said many of his decisions were 'inappropriate'.

- Hale Boggs - Died mysteriously in a plane crash while flying over remote Alaska in October, 1972 . Wreckage never found. In April 1971 he had made a speech on the floor of the House in which he strongly attacked J. Edgar Hoover and the whole of the FBI.

- Gerald Ford - Future President. Ford commented in his own report that the CIA destroyed or kept from investigators critical secrets connected to the assassination.

- John Sherman Cooper - In the general election in 1954 Cooper was defeated by Alben W. Barkley a Democrat who had been Vice President under Harry S. Truman but Barkley subsequently died, and Cooper was elected to fill his unexpired term in 1956.

- John J. McCloy - He was initially skeptical of the lone gunman theory, but a trip to Dallas with Allen Dulles, an old friend also serving on the Commission, in the spring of 1964 to visit the scene of the assassination convinced him of the case against Lee Harvey Oswald.

- Allen Welsh Dulles - Director of the CIA. It evolved under his directorship into a team of assassins. One member, Frank Sturgis, claimed: "this assassination group (Operation 40) would upon orders, naturally, assassinate either members of the military or the political parties of the foreign country that you were going to infiltrate, and if necessary some of your own members." (Sturgis was also one of the Watergate burglars) Dulles and his staff were forced to resign in September 1961 when President Kennedy reportedly said he wanted to "splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds."

The Warren report's lack of candor furthered anti-government cynicism, which in turn stimulated conspiracy theorists who propounded any number of alternative scenarios, all mutually contradictory, and all going strong today.

Who can you trust?
.

In a new revelation by Jackie Kennedy she recently revealed her suspicions of LBJ. And we all know she married Ari Onassis simply because he was the one man in the world who could actually protect her from an 'unexpected' and mysterious death. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 .... back to today ....

And an even more recent revelation suggests that Jackie Kennedy/Onassis recorded several tapes before she died. And they are somewhere. Waiting to be revealed. (President Trump promised to reveal them in the spring of 2018)  It is further proposed by some researchers, that Oswald was a paid asset of the FBI.
Arlen Specter, (later a Senator) was assistant counsel to the Warren Commission (recommended by Gerald Ford) and came up with the single bullet theory, which was readily adopted because having Connally and Kennedy shot by two separate bullets in such a short time frame would indicate TWO assassins and a conspiracy! Convenient, huh? Why did Specter miss so many obvious followup questions to the witnesses?  
More questions. In recent years, there have been suggestions that some secret sponsored shadow cell has plans for a coup d'etat of the American Government, even that 9/11 may have been the precursor.

And there are also those who also believe the coup was already accomplished on November 22, 1963!

But just investigating the one aspect of Officer Tippit is an interesting exercise and takes you well away from the 49 years of spin and cover up about JFK. Go ahead, try it. At the very least you'll have a fascinating read, way better than TV fiction. And you'll involve yourself in history.

start here - - -
Dallas Police Officer JD Tippit
Officer Tippit timeline 
JD Tippit homepage
Officer Tippit's autopsy
James Garrison Playboy interview


Follow the fascinating timeline and perhaps you will come up with more questions too: like why did the Davis sisters believe he lived in the nearby apartment house? Who DID live there to cause Tippit to be there often? Why was he speeding around frantically in the minutes after JFK was shot? Was he supposed to intercept Oswald? Why was he on West 10th Street when he was thought to be miles away at the Dealey Plaza by the overpass? How many contradictions may already be within the transcripts of accounts, interviews and events? Is there one somewhere, just waiting for a new eye to find it? Is there one sentence somewhere that says, 'This cannot be, therefore that must be?' 

They can't hide ALL the trails leading to truth. We finally learned the identity of deepthroat, anything can still happen.

And one thing about a coup d'etat, they don't all reveal themselves in a momentary flash through smoke and fire and violence ... they can emerge in stealth over many years. 



(Thanks to people like William M. Drenas  [Tippit Timeline],  for never exhausting their efforts in the search for truth) (my own interest in JFK goes way back to the sixties when James Garrison, New Orleans District Attorney announced his intention of laying charges in the assassination and he replied to a note I sent to him with several ideas, thanking me for my interest and communication.) 

Thursday, September 25, 2014

50th Anniversary of the Warren Commission

After fifty long years, the huge 26 volume Warren Commission Report is still unbelievable to 85% of the American people. And we are no closer to understanding the What, Why, and Who of the events. Except to suggest it was a coup d'etat of democracy. But it is not going away. Tidbits of information about the perps, if indeed they are the perps, continue to emerge. Even the side issue here about Officer Tippit remains of high interest. 
  

Saturday, October 28, 2017

JFK Revelations?

The first release of (some) details of the Kennedy assassination that have been held back for 55 years is out. These items were deemed so explosive that they here held secreted in the National Archives for a further 25 years after their first scheduled release.

There are about 3,100 unseen files, a deadline that was set by Congress in 1992 under the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act. The documents have been held in the National Archives, and the majority are already public.

American royalty

Here are what some commentators call  'interesting things'. As we know now, the CIA has over-ruled President Trump and held back further information for 180 days.


- Former CIA director Richard Helms: LBJ thought Kennedy assassination was payback for assassination of Vietnam president. From a 1975 deposition at Langley, CIA HQ,  "President Johnson used to go around saying that the reason President Kennedy was assassinated was that he had assassinated President Diem."
     Over many years investigators have concluded that not only did LBJ hate all Kennedys, but that he was aware of the event before it happened. Was this his attempt to deflect suspicions from American plots?

-  The CIA considered using mafia to kill Castro. Robert Kennedy told the FBI in 1975 that an "intermediary had been hired by CIA" to consult mobster Sam Giancana about hiring a gunman for $150,000 to kill Castro in Cuba.
The account is detailed in an FBI memorandum from 1975. The memo is part of an 83-page report that also said the CIA considered delivering a poison pill to kill Castro. Attorney General Robert Kennedy vetoed the idea of using a Mafia gangster.
     Again in 1975 this supposedly happened. And we all know by now that J. Edgar Hoover hated the Kennedy's with a vengeance. Other attempts to kill Castro were poison pills etc. RFK had stated long before that he was going to break the Mafia in America into splinters.

-  A memo from Hoover quotes a source within the USSR saying Soviets were shocked by the news of Kennedy's death. The source said the news sparked "great shock and consternation and church bells were tolled in the memory of President Kennedy."
"According to our source, officials of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union believed there was some well-organized conspiracy on the part of the 'ultra-right' in the United States to effect a 'coup,'" the memo said.
     Some people believe the coup might have been started then, and continued over the years until the placement and surreptitious effects were instigated, perhaps when George HW Bush became Director of the CIA? And that the coup of America needn't be armed men on every corner, but only the total manipulation and control of American lives. 

There are many other items, including someone who called the FBI with info that he was part of a group going to kill the President. And another anonymous caller to a British Newspaper the day of.



But one has to wonder why any of these so called revelations were considered secrets? There is nothing (so far) in the least explosive, and most of this info seems to come from FBI 'memos'.
Yes, the conspiracy theorists are already saying the CIA has had fifty years to manufacture any documents they wish. Which leads to the suggestion that at one time, way back in recent history, there WAS something incriminating in those National Archive documents.
Administration officials said there was no cover-up, just an effort to avoid compromising national security, law enforcement or intelligence gathering methods. Whatever methods might be suspect today, are long past blame on present day agencies. If this was just an attempt to convince America that all is well, it is too late, many have already turned to WikiLeaks for truth.

And most of the spin on this event, seems to point to a plot being Castro and Cuba. Perhaps so the America public will no longer think of CIA dark state cells, or FBI obfuscation, the Federal Reserve controlling all the money, or the MSM potentates squeezing your news down to what they want you to see and hear, or the Middle East oil cartels sponsoring election spending, or the so called Drug War designed to fail - or agents put in place, oblivious to their own supervisors, to implement the continuing coup of America.
No one needs a poll to conclude that Castro did not kill the President of America, something else has been going on, perhaps that is the reason the Establishment is so wired up with angst about Donald Trump?

These 'revelations' are for all those people who long ago, read the Warren Report Summery, without reading the basis of it and the facts that it was supposedly drawn from. Those who looked further, (Mark Lane - Rush to Judgement) quickly learned that the summery had no relation whatsoever to events on November 22 in Dallas.

The release of harmless information as revelations will only throw gasoline on the fires of conspiracy.
Business as usual. Keep your tin hat on, it's not over yet ....



Mark Lane's book -  
Rush to Judgment 

Who was she?
The Babushka Lady 

And: You can read my ideas of the death of Officer Tippet here and the following film will explain WHY he was killed and by who -  50th-anniversary-of-warren-commission.html



New:
Don't expect this next film to stay on any website anywhere for much longer - but if you are interested in JFK and how his death relates to the so called Deep State now emerging into public awareness in 2017, and how you are being manipulated you need to understand why. - you should watch this before it is gone. It is hypnotic and revolutionary and will definitely change how you view your present world. 

(for the present it is also view-able on Youtube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Qt6a-vaNM )

Sorry - the video was comments and info about the shooting of the President of the United States. It has been removed from YouTube for violating the 'Terms of Service' and the message was, as they construed it 'hate speech'!

The note which appeared from YouTube -  This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on hate speech. Learn more about combating hate speech in your country.

Yes I believe it too! Sad that after 50 years the coverup is still active!



Wouldn't you have been suspicious of this late route change? Policemen testified that it was not necessary to access the highway.

 

https://www.jfk-assassination.eu/media/drawings/route.php