Friday, June 13, 2014

Swimmng in the 20s.


Summer at the beach with inner tubes.


 
Clockwise, from top left ....
- I can outswim anybody.
- I like HER, so quit looking at me like that.
- He's with ME, quit looking at him like that.
- Everyone knows you're gay, you know.
- You liked me last night though, didn't you?
- Is the tube supposed to be this tight down there? Is he purposely sticking that thing out?
- I wanna swim forever and get some crabs!
- He told me not to tell the other guys what I did.  Pshaw, the other guys already know.






Sunday, June 08, 2014

Afraid of competition? ........................ Nope.


Audi accepts the challenge of Porsche coming back to Le Mans in a great video.






Improving the breed.


Le Mans 2014 24 hours - Saturday June 14 - Sunday June 15.



is that a Porsche tractor?

Sunday, June 01, 2014

Le Mans 1956 tour drive



British race driver Mike Hawthorn gives you a preview lap of Le Mans in 1956 driving a D type Jaguar .....
.... with French cars, motorbikes and bicycles all over the road! Even at over 150 MPH!






Thursday, May 29, 2014

The Internet in Real Time

This is like what is going on right now, every minute of every day, all the time.


Click the animation to open the full version (via PennyStocks.la).

Wednesday, May 14, 2014

Your future costs?

Yes it's about Enbridge and Northern Gateway so don't read on if you still deny facts about that project.

The Federal government, Lisa Raitt, Minister of Transport, just announced in a carefully worded release that 'Canada will strengthen its response plan for oil spills at sea ahead of the development of new pipelines that would sharply increase tanker traffic in Canadian waters if they are built.'

This so called strengthening means that instead of a $161 million budget out of a clean-up fund per incident being available, Lisa and her gang will allow the use of the complete fund of $400 million as a clean-up. That could be on the FIRST oil spill in the Douglas Channel. If you've ever been on an Alaskan Cruise trip through the Inside Passage, you'll know how pristine that area is.

Four hundred million seems like a lot doesn't it? Considering if you won the Lotto for 50 million you'd expect to live the rest of your life in luxury. But we need to consider the facts of money.
In the Kalamazoo oil spill which was on a river easily accessed by clean-up machinery, Enbridge has been called back several times by the US government to re-clean certain areas of the 40 miles still polluting that river. As you should know by now, bitumen doesn't float like oil on water, it sinks to the bottom! And continues to spoil the water, flora and fauna for years.
In order to pump oil tar sands through a pipeline, certain chemicals need to be added, most of which are a trade secret so we the public have no idea what they actually are, and it also must be heated to liquify it for passing through the pipe.
The costs, (so far) of the Kalamazoo spill clean-up have amounted to $1,039,000,000.00! That is 1.039 BILLION DOLLARS!
And that clean-up was handled by simply driving trucks up to the river edge and using vacuuming equipment and booms on that lazy flowing river! There is NO road access anywhere close to the Douglas Channel which has tidal differences today of a high of 19.28 feet to a low of 1.51 at Kitimat! All that water from the Hecate Straight at the open sea travels about 147 kilometers or 87 miles. It would seem that Enbridge doesn't want a repeat of costs like Kalamazoo and has lobbied the Canadian government on it.

So what the government has done, is release Enbridge from their responsibilities, and put the onus on the Canadian taxpayer to cover the costs of any massive spill! She also said the government will lift its ban on the use of dispersants in cases when using them offers a net environmental benefit. Dispersants are chemicals that break down oil slicks but can also harm marine life. So how can that be worded as a net environmental benefit? By talking faster? [Lisa Raitt is the same Minister who announced new rules for shipping dangerous goods by rail, after the Lac Magentic fire disaster, rules that say municipalities need to be told what toxic chemicals or flammable liquids go through their communities! BUT, and here is the attitude of our federal government towards our safety; the officials only can be told what dangerous cargo went through their area a YEAR later! And then only a few officials are told who are sworn to secrecy!]
So can we take our Transport Minister seriously when she now pimps for the tar sands oil industry?

So get back to that oil clean-up cost. In our case if the cost would be the same as the Kalamazoo spill clean-up, we the taxpayers would be on the hook for $639,000,000.! Not to mention the peripheral British Columbia costs of rehabilitating any wildlife or villages in the area.

Just have a look at the route of oil tankers full of tar sands bitumen crude with added secret chemicals. Are you as optimistic as Harper and Raitt that these ships will be able to maneuver those narrow passages without incident? Even in open sea it takes an oil tanker in 'crash stop' mode 14 minutes or three kilometers to stop!

Do you really believe Mz Raitt that $400 million will cover a spill or a tanker running into an rocky island in that wilderness? In fog or snow? But they're going to have special tugs, built for the purpose, they say. Haven't seen any announcements from ship builders, have you? Don't know of any channel pilots currently traveling that contorted route right now who could guide them either!

So what is at stake here? A potential disaster of massive proportions. The Chinese want our tar sands oil. They'll do whatever to get it. Somehow ??? they have convinced the Canadian government that shipping it via pipeline and tanker is the best possible method of getting it.
There are some proponents of rail shipping, gaining ground right now. Ok, but is that the same liquid chemical oil that would seep into waterways if a train tanker car derails? Yes but each car carries a finite amount of oil. No pump working all night.
And one could ask, why does it have to be liquified here in Canada in the first place? If we could get that raw bitumen to China by whatever means, why couldn't the Chinese produce their oil cheaper in China?
There is also the plan that no one wants to discuss, of processing the tar sands ourselves and selling the value added product, via piping it to our own existing Eastern Canada refineries. 


This is what the raw product looks like, a crumbly mixture of black sand, before processing it with chemicals and heat for piping it hundreds of miles. Why couldn't this product be simply loaded into rail hopper cars, like our coal shipments use now, and sent to the Roberts Bank SuperPort?
The facility is already set up for that kind of delivery. Part of it could be converted to handle the dry bitumen product. It could then be loaded into bulk carrier ships, sent off to China without the danger of an oil spill on land or wilderness channel and the lingering carcinogens and catastrophic remains.

We could leave it to China to convert their own bitumen to oil. Alberta gets to sell it, China gets to use it. Win win, without the environmental problems. But it seems that no one wants to see or talk about anything BUT the Enbridge pipeline to Kitimat. With a different plan, Enbridge would be cut out of the action. Northern Gateway would lose. And who knows how much has been paid to who to make sure the process goes according to plan? However secret that plan is supposed to be.

Me? I don't trust our federal government, Steven Harper or Lisa Raitt to handle it fairly or for the benefit of Canadians. Everything they say is carefully worded. And they treat themselves as third world officials who can be had. Manipulated. By taking Enbridge off the hook for the actual costs, they invite a bankruptcy to whatever company Enbridge forms to run this pipeline. Sort of like the USA has done with the drug companies, make them unaccountable to disastrous results to the populace.
And in spite of Janet Holder of Enbridge/Northern Gateway being on TV almost every day telling us she and the 'Joint Review Panel'  (sounds important, doesn't it?) approve of the pipeline, I can only suggest she move to Alberta and preach to the converted. And tell your PR folks the little heart shaped lake in your video isn't working.

$639,000,000. is a lot for you and I taxpayer to pay if the spill was in the Chiliwack river, even the Fraser.  But who knows the costs of trying to clean a remote wilderness full of inaccessible mountains and winding rising and falling tidal channels.

Do we really want to lay ground rules that mean nothing? Yes, you 'deny' people will continue using the word economy. But it might have lost it's charm.
And no carefully worded statement is now beyond the scrutiny of the people affected.

But isn't this what we feared years ago? That the desires of a few would over-rule the concerns of many?  And that people in Ottawa or China, or even Alberta have little interest in beautiful British Columbia.



Lisa Raitt new rules on pipeline safety

Kalamazoo river clean up costs

Dangerous goods by rail rules a joke?



NOTE: that the announcement today, (May 15) by Federal Minister Greg Rickford about oil companies covering all costs, would be for pipelines land based only, and do NOT cover a marine spill. Details still need to be explained in real life.

pipeline-firms-to-pay-all-costs-damages

And also note that BC Environment Minister Mary Polak released a consultation report last month on the land-based spill regime, which was described as a "complex matrix of regulations and policies."  But Mary has a reputation of doing what she's told and we think most things are complex to her.

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Violence VS Tenderness

Let's protect our children from behavior they shouldn't see, shall we?

A woman photographer was recently banned from Instagram, for posting a selfie pic showing her breast feeding her own child!
OMG! She what?

Not there yet, hold on. Get this: The account of maternity photographer Heather Bays was banned because her 20 month old CHILD was topless while breastfeeding!  And that, in the narrow minds of the people who run Instagram, is considered child pornography!
Instagram by the way, is owned by Facebook, the social site that the FBI the NSA and every police department in North America use to find out stuff about YOU!
Mz Bays had 2000 maternity photos on Instagram which were lost from their actions. Pictures of mothers and their children.

But is it only Instagram that is judging and governing our morals and conduct? Or is it a combined effort of inward thinking people with an agenda who want to eliminate love, tenderness from our lives while accepting violence and brutality? Is it all part of a mass conditioning plan? Violence is strong, tenderness is weak?


These photos are considered not good .....



 Maternal tenderness. Not good.










Shared happiness. Not good.







Love between people. Not good.






Gustave Courbet. Not good.








Topless infant. Really not good.












.... while these photos are acceptable .....


Manhunt game for young boys. ok








Stallone macho movie. ok









Instagram post. Which they say has strict policies about partial nudity. But this is ok.









Rihanna, young girls love her, but does she really 'like the way it hurts'? Can't be ok, can it?




Why are the dregs of society admired and copied while the beauty is chagrinned? Why are most comments about Jay Z and Solange saying, 'the bitch shoulda listened.' How did we get to this precipice of morality? Where did all those people go who were trustworthy to inspire and guide us?
Heather Mays  said, 'Every single day, women are shamed for just being women, for being mothers.' Ain't it the truth. And now we're starting to shame children for their innocence?

Joltin' Joe has left and gone away. So has sanity.
What are we actually protecting our children from?
Sad isn't it?






Friday, March 14, 2014

Cat? What cat?


 UNrapt attention? There's always one child thinking of something else ....




 Little Billy again?



Saturday, March 08, 2014

Quebec explained?

 
 
This is circulating right now,  worth a read .....
 
 
 
Quebec Explained...
 
 
 
Only in Canada...
 
In a busy Parisian café, a Quebec tourist is sitting alone, enjoying a crème caramel.  Another tourist approaches:
 
May I sit here?
No problem.
 
Thank you, very nice...
Are you on vacation?
 
Yes, I arrived yesterday.
What country are you from?
 
Norway. You?
From Quebec.
 
Quebec? I don't know Quebec...
Quebec... near the Atlantic, next to Ontario, the Great Lakes...
 
No, I don't know these places.
Never mind then, I'm from Canada.
 
Ah! Canada! Canada I know! So why you tell me you 
come from Quebec?
Because, my first country is Quebec!
 
Oh, you were born in Quebec and immigrated to Canada?
No, no, I was born in Quebec and I stayed in Quebec.
 
Oh, then your father is from Canada?
No, no, my father, my mother, my wife, my dog, 
everybody, they come from Quebec....
 
So why you say Canada?
For Christ sake, because you say you don't know 
where is Quebec!
 
OK, but if you say you not know Norway, I not say that my country is Japan.
Shit! Canada isn't Japan. Canada, it's my country.
 
Oh, your country not Quebec anymore?
My country is Quebec. But my country, it can be Canada, 
too, if the person I'm speaking to not know where 
is Quebec, Tabarnak!
 
I don't understand.
Look, it's simple: I come from the Province of Quebec, 
in the country of Canada.
 
Ok! But I didn't ask you what Province you're from, I ask you what Country you're from. Me, I come from Lofoten region in Norway, but I answer you Norway when you ask me what country I come from.
I know, I'm not stupid, Calisse! But me, when they ask me 
what country I come from, I answer Quebec. Even if it's 
the name of my Province. For me, it's my Country.
 
Oh, now I understand. You are a separatist, you want 
your Quebec province to be your country.
Are you crazy, Hostie? I don't want to know nothing 
from that shit!
 
I do not understand anything anymore!
I tell you before, it's simple! You ask me what country I 
come from, I answered Quebec because Quebec is my country, but I don't really want it to be my country, it would be too much trouble. I just want to say it. So, 
why don't you just let me say it?
 
I'm all mixed up. You have passport from what country: 
Quebec or Canada?
CANADA, Hostie!
 
So why you not tell me Canada right away?
Because it don't feel right. For me, Canada is Anne Murray, 
the Calgary Stampede, the Mounted Police, SARS, it's not my home all that. Home, it's La Famille Plouffe, Seraphin Poudrier, La P'tite Vie, Felix Leclerc, La Poune, Les Canadiens de Montreal, Les Bougons... Do you understand that?
 
Less and less...
Listen, forget all that shit. Ask me another question.
 
Ok, what town you come from?
Mmm... I don't know anymore!
 
You not know what town you come from?
Yes, yes, I know what town I come from, but my town it merged with another town, but soon it is going to demerge from the town that was supposed to be my town.
 
Oh, that very complicated! When you write your address, 
what do you write?
I don't know anymore. Before, I used to write Hull, but Hull changed to Gatineau, but they tell us to wait 3 years before stopping to write Hull to not mix up the mailman. But now, the Liberals they pass a law that make it okay for Gatineau to be Hull again, but I don't know if we have to wait 3 years to be able to write Hull, or when the 3 years are passed, if we have to write Gatineau for 3 years, and after we write Hull. Unless, of course, the PQ come back in power and we remerge with Gatineau, then we'll have to write Gatineau for 3 years.
 
I'll leave now; I my head hurts...
It's so simple, Tabarnak: My town is Hull, my country is Quebec. But if you prefer, my town is Gatineau and mycountry is Canada.
 
OK, I think I understand!
It's about time. Anyway, it was fun talking to you, if you come around where I live; maybe you come and see me.
 
OK, but where? Hull in Quebec or Gatineau in Canada?
You're a pain in the ass. Forget the whole thing.
 
 
 
 
 
That, my friends, may be the most accurate portrait of Quebec that you will ever get!



(author unknown)

Thursday, March 06, 2014

Ongoing dispute - Piers Morgan vs Jeremy Clarkson


Piers Morgan and Jeremy Clarkson are having a public dispute about something or other! So here is a video of the only side we care about .... Jeremy's ....






Jeremy Clarkson for the win!









Tuesday, February 25, 2014

The Elephant in the Room

Here we go again. Quebec vs Canada.
A recent EKOS poll commissioned by the CBC found that half of Quebec's anglophone and allophone population have considered leaving the province in the past year. Allophones are those who do not claim English or French as their first language. Madame Marois has been feeding the flame of separation with English Canadians again, just as Parizeau did those few years ago, and he blamed the 'f***ing ethnics' for that loss.

The EKOS Research Associates study has 51% of anglophones and 49% of allophones wanting/trying/preparing to leave Quebec. They are finding it bleak to live there. In spite of the continuing dole the French-Canadians in Parliament handout to that province. The economy and language anxiety are large factors.

Remember the last vote? It went down to the wire, making 50.58%, and even when it was found later that the 'No' side illegally spent over half a million dollars influencing the vote, and that the people of Quebec were uninformed or misinformed, some might say disinformed.  The 1980 question proposed to negotiate 'sovereignty-association' with the Canadian government, while the 1995 question proposed 'sovereignty', along with an optional partnership offer to the rest of Canada. The question suggested that English Canadians would somehow agree to this 'partnership' with a sovereign Quebec.  And perhaps they would if we allow the present French influence to remain in our parliament. But will we want MPs elected by their Quebec constituents to negotiate the future of Canada with other Quebeckers?

On the night before the last vote, orders came to the Canadian Army serving there, that as of the morning, they would switch their allegiance to Quebec and would no longer be true to Canada! And all the military bases, along with armaments, equipment and hardware would belong to Quebec.

The people of the province were led to believe that everything would remain the same after separation: They believed Quebec would still send seventy-five MPs to Parliament in Ottawa, where they would continue trying to influence Canadian affairs and direct a continuing largess to their own province! They believed, that whatever jobs they had in Ontario would go on as normal, even as they crossed their border into Canada. That they would use Canadian money. That they would still be issued Canadian passports! French would remain the dual language throughout Canada and Canadian embassies around the world. Places like Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories and Whitehorse in the Yukon would still have the costs of a foreign language. They believed that any Federal offices of Canada would just stay in a foreign country to be operated by foreigners, They believed all the products made in Quebec would flow as usual to Canadian provinces and territories to be sold as usual. All that Quebec butter sold in British Columbia under the label Fraser Valley butter and made in Quebec would still melt into our unsuspecting toast on a Vancouver morning. The so called partnership only deceived the Quebec naivete that they would continue the welfare dole from the rest of Canada. They voted on that carefully engineered but uncertain plan. It was deception.

So they nearly did it that time under the smoky leadership of Parizeau. Is Marois a bigger threat? Yes, she is smarter than the others. Careful and calculating. She has recently said she will use no English in her new election campaign. If she gets a majority government, a new referendum will follow.

And what preparations is the Canadian government making for this inevitability? Seems like none. Why? Because the government is largely controlled by people from Quebec. They don't want anything scary falling into the deliberate mix Marois is making for her very own country.

So what should the Canadian government do? Or what should the people of Quebec know about before their crucial vote?  (During the last vote, Jean Chretien said literally nothing about the situation, and many believe he was so quiet on the issue so he could call himself the Father of his Country when the Yes vote came in. It was deception by omission.) The people of that province need to know we have no interest in any partnership that only shovels more money into their coffers.

MPs from everywhere BUT Quebec should be considering the huge backlash across the country after a province largely supported by them thumbs it's nose and leaves. Would the separation force a Canadian election? Who do you vote for? Born in Alberta Stephen Harper? Quebec Native Justin Trudeau? Thomas Mulcare who had no evidence of a Canadian flag at his Montreal convention?
And what real claims does Quebec actually have in Canada? None. General Wolfe settled those claims for the British in 1759.

And be aware Quebec, that any negotiations will take place with the balance of power in Canada, shifted dramatically to the West.
Note that aboriginals fought for Wolfe

Quebeckers should know that: Their will be no sovereignty association. If they leave they will not take the Canadian Armed Forces or their equipment with them. Companies located in Quebec will have to pass the same scrutiny to sell their goods as any other foreign country and will have to compete with any Canadian business who can supply or do the same job. Any MP in Ottawa will be sent home immediately to run for his own 'National Assembly'. We will stop all transfer payments from Canada to Quebec, no need to support a foreign country. All passports held by citizens of Quebec will be immediately cancelled. Canadian Embassies will look after Canadian business and interests. Quebec may apply for Consular status to use our stations. All military work, maintenance etc, will be shifted out of Quebec to Canadian owned and operated companies. Any jobs held by Quebeckers in Ontario will be immediately terminated, supervisors escorted from the buildings by security, and those jobs advertised for Canadians to apply for. There will be Customs and Immigration Posts at all border points. All goods manufactured in Quebec will be assessed the current tariffs equal to any other country starting up. Most Favoured Nation status will have to be applied for, no different than Korea or Togo. The only language preference for Canada will be English, with certain allowances for local populations and their dominant language. Yes that still means French in some areas, but also aboriginal languages and Chinese, Italian, Punjabi or whatever the majority in the community is.

Negotiations for the separation will be made between whom ever Quebec sends, and Canadian negotiators born outside of Quebec. Canadians with their bent for fairness will negotiate in good faith, of course, but without the prospect of continuing the 20 billion in transfer payments currently flowing into that have-not province. And with due consideration of the desires of the Northern Aboriginals in Quebec who have always expressed their strong feelings to remain, with their territories as Canadians.

Quebec will be free to follow its own clouded destiny. In their wishes to be very French we suspect they will make agreements and treaties with France, Haiti or any Francophone country that will deal with them. We wonder how they will sell goods into America with nothing but the French language on them.
But whatever the result of Pauline Marois and her political ambitions to be the head of a brand new country, she is no Iron Lady who can influence an old country stinging from a Yes vote to give her what she wants.And Pauline, please be honest with your people, you don't want your new country formed on lies or deceptions. Oui?

Wherever the progression goes for Quebec leaving Canada, we need to be perfectly clear to Canadians and the people of Quebec what will happen on the day after a Yes vote and a majority. But we need to make that clarity long before any vote.
We don't wish you anything bad, Quebec, only good riddance. Canada, now we need you to Stand on Guard for us.

Strong and free?


Bonne chance.

So be it.



Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Mistaken Identity?

TMZ - it's not just a faux pas .... 

QUESTIONAIRE

Who ARE these guys?



Lawrence Fishburn
Wolf Blitzer
Morgan Freeman

Samuel L. Jackson




TMZ anchor reporter
Sam Rubin
Shouldn't he be fired?

What's in YOUR gullet?


Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Fiction vs Fact


Sorry Julia, but there aren't enough push-ups in the world to make you look like the real Erin Brockovich!




Au natural. Amen.



cc: Beautiful Smart Women of the World, INC.
cc: www.HollywoodLies.com
cc: Dr. Quick's Mammobig clinic.


Saturday, January 04, 2014

It is about YOU folks.

Is there any hope for your grandchildren in the future? Looking bleak so far! More secret trade agreements coming your way. Corporations about to take over the world, supported by your own government. New World Order is in progress!



.



Monday, December 30, 2013

Plans for war.

Ferry Porsche is showing Hitler the very first Volkswagen ....

Ferry Porsche - "You see Adolph. Ve hide der motor into ze boot at rear, vhen British look for motor unter der bonnet in front, ve tell za swine our autocar runs on AIR! Zey vill give up, ve win der war."

Adolph - "Ingenious Ferry! Und where is das air cumink from?"

Ferry Porsche - "But Adolph, it ist not air, ve only tellink British it is air."

Adolph - "Ve could use old air pumps from Hindenburg refueling field. Zat blimp ist not comink back anyway."

Ferry Porsche - "Ja, vee could, but zay are helium pumps for der airship. Zee autocar runs on gas."

Adolph - "Gas? Ah clever, passink wind will run zee car, you hear zat, Doenitz?  Und bratwurst is plentiful."

Officer at back - (whisper)  "Der freakin' Fartswagen."

Ferry Porsche - (sigh) "Okay Adolph, air it vill be."


Admiral Doenitz - "Und if ve run out of air, ve could fling dem beetle bugs across der Englisch channel filled mit explosives."

Adolph - "Ja, Admiral, filled mit helium zay vill float high und blow up well. Toss a few of dese vagens at der Poland volks in der mornink."

Admiral Doenitz - "Ja Mine Fuehrer. I start za war now."

Adolph - (satisfied deep inhale) "Air. Ingenious! Ferry, make tanks mit air too."


Ferry Porsche - (under breath) "Good Grief."




Saturday, December 21, 2013

Britain protecting citizens.

From the evil terrorists.
Oh wait, that's not it, this is a new protection for the people. The Pornorists are after you now.
Britain is starting internet control of pornography even before the Americans do it.  
British Telecom (BT) has activated an internet porn filter, covering virtually all the Internet Service Providers, which automatically switches on parental controls for new Internet customers.  
The move is part of a plan announced by Prime Minister David Cameron back in July, which called on ISPs to block Internet porn by default for all U.K. citizens by year's end. The so-called porn filters are being applied now. No more tittie titilation guys. No more dangling dongles ladies. Britain is about to attain world wide web purity.

Easy huh? Protecting you. Now all we have to do is define porn.  
But first, you should know that a computer science student has already come up with a by-pass for the ISP filters, allowing all you dirty old men in the basement to access what you want so badly. And we all know that the deer hunting wallpaper picture on your screen isn't fooling the wife. 
Lewd boy David?
The work-around is called 'Go Away Cameron' and allows you to see all the porn you want, in spite of BT expecting to spend about 10 million pounds implementing these censorship programs!  In Australia, they started the same type of filters and a 16 year old broke it in 30 minutes! 
Soon they'll be blocking an apple a day because Eve ate one and look what happened!

But look at what is happening right now! Oh yeah, the defining porn part. The filters are blocking web sites that give information on sex education, safe sex, rape crisis help lines have been blocked. LGBT charity sites are blocked. Health educational sights are being blocked.
What is to happen to fine art sites? Will Picasso be subject to 'reverse twist' technology to find the porn beneath his cubes? And Gauguin in the South Pacific, languoring around with those brown bodied Polynesians? What about movie poster advertising? Will they eliminate figure drawing classes websites?  Will doctors xrays be xrated? 
We certainly can't have Cosmopolitan Magazine website telling us in detail how to do all those naughty things. And all .org sites will be gone.
Is this shame on the seashore?


Is this a ba-ad woman?



   










And what about website shopping, booming right now as a multi-billion dollar business. No more Victoria's Secret underwear ordering from the comfort of your own home? (Maybe they could put a timer on the site so if you don't order something in ten minutes you get blue screen.) Will condoms have to be advertised on the web as big white balloon animal kits because of the clowns at Porn Prevention Central?
BTW, The British are second only to Americans for time spent on porn sites, according to PornHub statistics, which is almost ten minutes! 
Is it keywords they look for? Will they flag you if you say you like breast of chicken? What'll happen if you Google search a 'big cock in the farmer's barnyard'?  There must be a hundred Cat Fancier sites in England looking for pussy. And I bet a lot of Welsh aviarys have a pair of nice Tits. Will Aer Lingus be wiped off the net because of typo searches? Will Scottish sports sites be able to mention tossing the caber? Will breeding Angus bulls ever be horny again?

Of course ISP British watchdogs might have to consider fetish as porn too. Now that includes literally everything; OMG your socks smell wonderful! You mean dress in yellow duck suits and do it on the roof of a building? (tremolo) And some people's innate but insistent, intimate desire is to be chained naked, upside down on a wall, and have Xena beat the hell out of you! But is that porn?


Just who will define this porn? The British Parliament? The Righteous Virgin Spinster Society?  ISP CEOs wearing $1000 suits and 4 day underwear?  The Church of England?  GCHQ?  The SPCA?

Is this porn?
Is there an upside? Will Lady Gaga and Miley Cyrus be banned?  Just looking at Mariah Carey arouses prurient thoughts with some. (Me!) Will we be able to submit our own definitions of porn? That might be fun. Can we get those 'How to grow your penis' ads to go away? No, it wouldn't work, too many people would define porn as an MP lying in Parliament.

Do we really expect to eliminate a billion dollar industry when 12% of ALL websites are porn sites? Twenty-four million of them! Even the purveyors of porn have asked for years to have their own extension of .xxx instead of .com to help parents with blocking. Always refused by the powers who pretend to know everything. 

Can Britain eliminate the use of porn watching in your home with filters for everyone's web access? Maybe, but does that lead back to men hanging about in parks instead of their own basements?

Is this?

Meanwhile, let's keep our children safe and have them looking at guns, violence and bombs instead. 

Scariest of all is wondering what is next that the British Government doesn't want you to see? Pornorists are just the start.
Hmm.

 
Porhub Stats 2013 - review

stats-on-internet-pornography 



Thursday, December 12, 2013

Dali & Disney

Candid conversation between Salvador and Walt showing off a mini train engine. 


 "Walter, I teenk this would look mucho better if we melted it a leettle bit. "

     "Sal, that's a crazy idea. Are you fucking Goofy? "

         "No, I am nod dat way, but could hit Minnie if she was available."




Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Separated at birth?




Minister Bill Bennett and the What me Worry kid.

Bennett is Minister of Energy and Mines and Minister Responsible for Core Review, and he says our BC Hydro rates will increase by 28%  ..... his association to Mad is that the people of BC are suspicious of his motives and are always mad at him!

The What me Worry kid is Mad Magazine's funny looking idiot guy whom everyone likes.




Some consider only one of them an idiot.

Guess.

Sunday, November 24, 2013

Spin and scam from the Federal Government

Are Canadians just dumb?

Here's a good one and a perfect example of the Federal Government putting one over on you and the municipalities across Canada. It's about the railroads and dangerous goods.
So here's what they are saying,

'Months after the deadly train disaster in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, the federal government is forcing rail companies to tell municipalities when they transport dangerous goods through their communities.' 

Well, it sort of sounds that way, doesn't it?

Lisa Raitt, Minister of Transport, announced new regulations about the transport of dangerous goods on Parliament Hill Wednesday. This is unadulterated spin and a scam against all Canadians who could be put at risk just like those unsuspecting people in Quebec! The Harper government is letting the railroad companies dictate policy, which could be at the expense of lives all across Canada. 

Raitt issued what she called a protective direction Wednesday in the hope it will result in better communication between municipalities and rail companies. She acknowledged that the information won't prevent another tragedy like the one on July 6, when oil-laden tanker cars derailed and exploded into flames, killing dozens of people and devastating the picturesque core of Lac-Mégantic. 
"But what it might do is give municipalities more tools to better prepare for possible future disasters," she told a news conference in Ottawa. "This part is about response and ensuring that communities have the information that they identify that they want to have." That was double-talk! 
How the hell do you prepare when you don't get advanced notice?
Are you as stupid as Lisa Raitt thinks you are? Will this go right over the collective head of Mayors and city officials across the nation? Seems that is what the Transport Ministry is hoping for.

So I HOPE someone in Parliament actually asks Raitt how does a municipality prepare for dangerous goods a year after they pass through? Do you tell the dead people lying by the tracks in Lac-Magentic to look out for the train that went through?
If this wasn't so serious it would be a crying joke! 

The government says that Canadian Class 1 railway companies (whatever they are?) that transport dangerous goods will provide municipalities with detailed dangerous goods information every three months.
Would that be like, Hey, you little town, we shipped a nuclear bomb through your town three months ago. It didn't go off.
Any other company or person that transports dangerous goods will also have to inform municipalities what was transported through the community, but on an annual basis. No clarification whether the culprit railroad, with only a one man crew, Montreal, Maine & Atlantic, is a class 1. 2 or 20, does it matter in Raitt's mind?

None of the information has to be provided in advance

Is this just an asinine announcement by an idiotic person to a totally gullible public?
Claude Dauphin, president of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities is clearly duped by the scam, "It sends a clear message that the government of Canada fully agrees that local governments need to know basic information about dangerous goods being transported through their communities." Being transported and WAS transported is a distinction he cannot make, or chooses not to, and it is incredible that he didn't notice.

The airhead Justin Trudeau commended Raitt for issuing the 'order'! And you wonder why he's considered an airhead? What was the order?

Keep voting folks, you're getting what you wanted. 

Explosions à Lac-Mégantic: trains ou pipelines?
72 oil tankers crashed - killing 47 people! 

"Look out, a dangerous train went through!"
"It's okay, they're going to let us know."
"Before or after the funerals?"




Tuesday, October 22, 2013

The Galloping Ghost

Red Grange tests an early football helmet behind Orville's barn.




   "Red is a great football player and a brave man." 

       "Yer Gallopin' Ghost thought he'd gallop straight through that barn wood."
 
             "Ol' Red's frickin' barmy, ain't he? but we shoulda told him there's a stone wall behind that wood"